Improvements can always be made, but change for change's sake is bad design.ĭon't throw the baby out with the bathwater, just because you don't like the look of the bathwater. This is a plague that became popular during the late 60s and early 70s, where suddenly companies that had used the same brand presence for a century had to have something "modern" and new, and threw away brand presence a century had built up. If using a particular font is the only thing you see in a design, that's on the designer, not the font.Īlso, in my opinion, changing familiar logos and brand marks just to keep them current is faddish design that should be avoided at all costs. There's nothing wrong with using Times New Roman if you use it appropriately. Still, overuse of any particular font is not a reason not to use it. However, what kind of designer are you if you can't make something look good even using plain default basics?īuying some exotic or expensive font just to make your design stand out is bad design. No, they aren't appropriate everywhere, and yes, they may get overused because they are defaults, therefore cheap. "Default" fonts become so because they are broadly useful.Įven really "bad" fonts, like comic sans or papyrus, have appropriate uses and applications. Join our Discord server Design Subreddits LISTĮvery font has its place and its appropriate uses. Please report any posts which break these rules, to maintain the quality of the subreddit. No Candid / Non-Consenting Explicit / Sensitive ContentĬontact / Engage Moderators Appropriatelyįor full explanation of the rules see here. Shared work must have a comment for context and use the green "Sharing Work" flair.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |